POLITICS of the day. . .

While it remains somewhat consolable that most mythical “origins” stories aren’t compatible with anything it should indubiously be understood that ‘Jesus of Nazareth' wasn't Christian. . .
*
It might also be understood that archeology records have indicated the throws of Christianity may’ve started during the time of Socrates some 250 yrs. before the anointment of Pontius Pilate as the new governor of Judea. . .
*
While it's to also be understood that while the Synagogues having made a somewhat precarious peace with the newly appointed governor had little interest in the doings of the newly anointed self-styled “meshuganda” which the early Christian radicals called the King of the Jews . . .
*
It’s also to be understood the Synagogues having consolidated a somewhat precarious peace with the newly anointed governor ‘Pilate’ harried no incentive in asking for Barabbas ('Barabbas' being notably an anarchist) or any other kind of motivation that might've involved them in the anarchy of the radically motivated Christians. . .
*
While it should also be understood that the Christians were the only ones who may've had an incentive in asking for "Barabbas" thus furthering their cause for civil disobedience or the insipience rioting of disruotion. . .
*
While it therefore should be unequivocally understood that “Christians” were the only ones who may’ve had a motivation in the tempting of Christ or the Everlasting Son of Bethlehem. . .
*
Perhaps what the church has yet to understand or needs to discover with-in the ‘hub-bub’ of today’s political schema's that outrageousness doesn’t outweigh the ravages of crisis or perhaps that the most unfathomable kinds of haphazard Ness of crimes or political schema will always disparage themselves from being participant of the true adamancy, or democracy that has existed from immortality that’s founded in the truthful teachings of a Messiah, or the Buddha or the profit of ‘Zoroastrianism’ or Mohammed, etc. having been self-sustained and formally decreed in the existence of a Universal citizenry, and the thoughtful forgiveness of an infinitesimal cosmos . . .
*
While it's not authentication that distracts from the existence of a Messiah or the Buddha or Zarathustra, etc. but rather the insistence of an exactness that’s infinite of ’form’ having belied the virility of its preservation or the exactness of the creativeness that’s infinite in the imperfection of invisible well-being and forgiveness. . .
*
Thus it never occurred to anyone in those days that the whole style of questioning or perhaps the illogical assumption of the directive employed was demeaning of a self-loathing or the humanistic reasoning that exploits the cosmic forces of “only God hast to know what God hast to know” as what consumes the affinities of all things forthwith praiseworthy, and undeniable of that which’s understandable in the meening of politeness or the cognative reasoning of an infinite duality which hopefully enlightens all toward the greater logic of an infinitesimal tomorrow. . .

~fin